In most discussions on the impact of
tourism on Goa, the issues that locals face as a result of the tourism do not
enjoy much attention. With charter flights landing from the beginning of
October, there was quite a buzz in the media speculating a successful tourist
season. The buzz, perhaps, was created because the industry is in such dire
straits and much of Goa’s economy is believed to depend on the footfalls of
tourists. In all these reports, there was an image
that stuck in my mind, which I think is symbolic of the misguided way in which
tourism is conducted in Goa.
Those who arrived on the first charter
flight were given a warm welcome with roses, and a brass band belting out some
tunes in the background. These were scenes of happy and hospitable Goans. Apart
from drawing on the stereotype of Goans being ever open to tourists and
tourism-related activities, the welcome given to the charter tourists looked
like an attempt by the Tourism department to remedy the image of Goa’s tourism
industry which has taken a hit due to reports of mismanagement, environmental
degradation, the rising rate of crime, and the destruction of Goan resources
through an unsustainable increase in the number of tourists.
The aforementioned image seems to be a
part of a pattern: a history of tourism policy-making that has only viewed the
average Goan as a happy-go-lucky person who does nothing but enjoys and
entertains. One can access this history of the creation and implementation (or
the lack of proper implementation) of tourism policies in Goa through two
documents: the “Master
Plan for Tourism Development in Goa”, July 1987 and
the recent “Tourism
Master Plan”, 2016. These documents tell us how the
policy-makers conceptualized Goa as a tourist destination, and how, through the
implementation of this policy, the successive governments failed to take
account of the problems that were identified in these documents. For instance,
the ‘master plans’ recognized that there are limits to the number of tourists a
place can accommodate; yet, we see that successive governments have tried to
increase the number of tourists in Goa. More tourists require more people to
service them and this has led to large-scale migration of labor into Goa. While
the absence of proper labor laws and regulatory mechanisms have led to the
influx of a large number of migrant labor and consequently their exploitation
as well, the high influx also indicates that tourism as an industry has failed
to provide gainful and dignified employment to local Goans as one can observe
Goans migrating elsewhere for better job opportunities. So, how has all this
tourism benefitted Goa and Goans?
During the 1980s when the Indian state
and the Goan government were trying to promote tourism, they created the image
of Goa as a timeless paradise. Goa was marketed as a blend of the East and the West,
a slice of Southern Europe in India that tourists could afford for a fraction
of the price. As Paul Routledge writes in his essay, “Consuming Goa: Tourist
Site as Dispensable Space” in the Economic and Political Weekly (2000),
the tourism industry was driven by the logic of consumption; nothing could
stand in the middle of ‘Goa the paradise’ and the leisure consumption of the
incoming tourists.
In such a scenario of Goan resources being
offered for the consumption of tourists, what happens of the local Goan? The
problem is that the local Goan is only included in the planning of tourism
development as a service-provider, or worse, as someone who has to endure the
mismanagement of public infrastructure because the tourism industry requires
that Goa’s resources – roads, water, land, etc – be pressed in the service of the tourists.
Thus, a lot of Goa’s economic planning today is oriented to serve the tourists,
not the locals. The casinos in the Mandovi are a great example of this kind of
development. Even the viral
e-petition that demanded the introduction of
app-based taxi services in Goa argued that the main reason why Goa needs such
alternate transport services is because “[t]ourism is the backbone of Goa’s
economy and tourists across the world & India are used to services like
OLA/UBER, it’s [sic] time to allow them to operate in Goa”. The first
benefit of such a move, the petition suggests, is – not surprisingly – a “boost
to tourism”.
Could this e-petition, like much of
Goa’s tourism policy-decisions, be oriented in a different direction? Could the
locals be privileged over the tourists? Could the petition have said that
because of the increase in Goa’s population and the abysmal public transport
system, the locals need to be provided with alternate and affordable modes of
transportation?
While governmental policy has favored
tourists over locals, the response from Goa’s civil society, too, seems to be
trapped within the same logic. At the end of the day, Goans giving into the
logic of leisure consumption or of understanding Goa as a pleasure periphery
(especially of India), effectively means that local Goans – us – have very
little say in our own collective economic and cultural future. Even if the
economy is in a bad state and the state coffers are almost empty, one must find
better ways to rejuvenate Goa’s economic situation. Such a scenario would be
always better than selling away our say in our collective future for a few
pieces of silver.
(First published in O Heraldo, dt: 11 October, 2017)
No comments:
Post a Comment