Along with the rising temperature this
summer, there has been a sharp increase in the deaths related to road accidents.
The first half of 2016 produced some truly chilling statistics with the death
toll for the month of January and February reaching
59 persons. April 2016 saw a staggering 11 deaths in just 5 days. While one
may have heard, and received, cautionary advice at the beginning of the monsoon
season owing to the slippery roads, perhaps we also need to caution each other
at the start of every summer in a similar way. After all, the rising temperature
seems to be making our roads, quite literally, hotbeds for fatal accidents.
How does one discuss the tragic deaths
on the roads, and also the general usage of and safety on roads? The obvious
question to ask is, “who is responsible?” Is it the State or the motorists?
With academic studies and road accident reports reflecting that most accidents
are caused by reckless motorists, it does appear that the individual driver is
at fault for recklessness on the roads. I do not wish to argue against these
findings, rather I would like to add to them so that when we debate the issue
of road safety, we do not slip into an ‘either/or’ position.
There was a common thread running
through the statements of the many activists working on road safety that O Heraldo’s Vibha Verma interviewed
– that reckless driving was the cause of accidents. For instance, Ruan Mendes,
an activist, observes, “One should not hold the authorities responsible alone,
but he/she [the motorist] should take every precautionary measure and
diligently follow traffic rules…” This reckless driving is more serious, it was
argued, with persons who operate heavy-vehicles, as they are the ones who cause
the most number of accidents. Thus, heavy-vehicles and reckless driving emerge
as the deadly combo that is driving the accident rate through the roof.
However, the recent and tragic death
of two women at Tilamol, Quepem should make us think about faulty economic
policies of the State a bit more critically. This is not the first time that
people have been killed at the very same spot in Tilamol. If we go back in time
in 2010, a rasta
roko was staged by the angry inhabitants of
Curchorem and Quepem after a similar incident where a man was
crushed to death. This was at the time when mining-related transportation was
in full swing. Six years later, another mining-related heavy-vehicle is the
cause of two deaths. While the residents of Quepem and Curchorem, then as now,
demanded a separate bypass road solely for the purpose of mining
transportation, nothing has come of the demand. What this also indicates is
that the State is not able to effectively balance between the flow of economic
activities – of which transport/roads form a major part – and the everyday life
of the common people. Thus, while the person at the wheel of a heavy-vehicle is
indeed indulging in reckless and potentially harmful behavior, the lack of
foresight and planning on the part of the State aggravates the problem.
Similarly, one can think of
road-widening projects as being counter-productive for the general safety on
roads. It increasingly appears that roads are widened or repaired so that they
would look good, rather than properly regulate the flow of traffic – for the
traffic-flow does not improve substantially. What further complicates the situation
in Goa is that the tiny or narrow roads in the villages can immediately meet a
national highway, and cause confusion in the minds of the drivers. The new
bypass roads constructed as an aid to the existing highways are a good example,
as they run through rice-fields and villages. That land is fast depleting in
Goa should also make us realize that road-widening is not a viable option.
So, we are slowly coming to realize the
intervention by the State through policing, fines, awareness campaigns,
regulations, and infrastructure development is not helping. Further the
suitability of the urban and economic vision of the State, which privileges a
neo-liberal, faster-bigger-is-better vision, should really be examined again.
Rather than asking whom one should blame, it might be more useful to demand
that thorough professionals be employed who are committed to a vision of
streamlining and regulating the existing roads in Goa – with their close
proximity to houses, trees, and other structures. Possibly, each and every road
needs to be studied as to how this links to other roads and what is the best
way to regulate it. In other words, the network of village, taluka, district, and
city roads need to be studied as a particularly Goan problem, if we would like
a meaningful solution. That and providing efficient public transport may be the
only meaningful solution to the problems on roads.
I have in the past argued
that the experience of Goan roads is marred by the aggression that motorists
subject each other to. We need to recognize how individual behavior frustrates
the implementation of state policies that are obviously beneficial, and how
faulty state policies lead to chaos – and even death on roads. Both are two
sides of the same coin.
Illustration: Angela Ferrao.
(First published in O Heraldo, dt: 11 May, 2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment