Reginald Fernandes was one of Konkani’s
most proficient writers, having more than a hundred books to his credit, with
his avid readers excitedly waiting for his next offering. Fernandes wrote romans, which can be translated as
novels (or novelettes, if one is being pedantic). Although Fernandes, and the
genre of Konkani writing to which he contributed immensely was and is very
popular, the romans as well as
Fernandes have not received the critical scholarly and literary appreciation,
that they so rightfully deserve.
From Sat Somdir (1951) |
This column would like to look at one of
the earliest works of Fernandes, Sat
Somdir published in 1951. The theme that I would like to particularly
explore revolves around the author’s understanding of mog (love) and dignidad (loosely
respect, status, and human dignity). The basis of many romanses and tiatrs, one
can suggest, was formed through the enmeshing of these two ideas, against the
backdrop of social inequality. Thus, in this work Anita, a girl who is born
into a rich family and lives in a grand house, falls in love with Alfred,
hailing from a poor family and whose mother had raised him by working as farm
labour. Very early on in the novel we have Fernandes stating, “To ortouta pisso, zo sor corit dignidadic
ani mogac,” (He errs badly who associates status [social standing] with
love).
Needless to say, the love between Anita
and Alfred is put to the test, not ostensibly because Alfred lacks nobility,
but also due to the fact that Anita’s uncle wants to usurp her inheritance amounting
to some four lakh rupees. Anita was an orphan, who had lost her mother when she
was only three and her father when she was eleven. Yet, one need not be led
into believing that the plot of Sat Somdir
is solely revolving around pecuniary matters. Indeed, the basis of the
novel is love between social un-equals and how the realization of this love
leads to the restoration of human dignity and respect or dignidad.
Anita and Alfred decide to elope to Bombay,
but Diogo – Anita’s uncle – gets wind of the plan. It is here that the
tribulations that the young lovers have to face, begin. Within such an ordeal,
Fernandes also takes his reader on an adventurous journey, full of
possibilities. When Alfred is left for dead in the dense forest of Sattari, he
meets a Sadhu who gives him shelter in the divull
(temple) that he takes care of. Here Alfred comes across a richly adorned
idol in the temple, which has a magical thic
(diamond), called Sat Somdir. The
magical power of this particular diamond is that it can show the whereabouts of
any person, as if being projected on a screen.
It is not just the diamond that provides
the ‘magical’ relief in the novel, but other kinds of medicinal herbs (ocot as Fernandes would refer to it)
also come into the plot at crucial moments. So what we have here is that, at
crucial moments when the reader thinks that the plot is going in an expected
direction, Fernandes brings in twists and turns – and indeed there are many in
this novel! Magic and fantasy is important for Fernandes in another way as
well. I would like to suggest that twists brought about by magic at various
parts of the novel, also acts as a device of deus ex machina. Such a device, it can be suggested, is necessary as
in a rigidly hierarchical society as that of India and Goa, how are two people
madly in love with each other, ever to find the realization of their love? In
other words, escape from rigid hierarchies is facilitated by magic.
In keeping with the author’s thinking or
conceptualization that love and dignidad can
be accomplished, not only through breaking social boundaries but also having
material riches, the novel ends with Anita and Alfred being joined in holy
matrimony as well as recovering a lost treasure of gold bars. Before this, it
so transpires that Alfred gets incarcerated in the dreaded prison of Aguada,
and the Sadhu from the temple of the Sattari jungle through the use of some ocot, manages to get him out of the
prison. The guards at the prison thinking that Alfred is dead bury him in the
prison cemetery. Anita comes to know of this through the ghost of a man, who
was the business partner of her father in Africa. This particular ghost had
cheated Anita’s father of many lakhs of rupees and had purchased gold bars,
which were buried near his house. It was this chicanery that was keeping the
ghost bound to the earth. So in the end, Anita’s greedy and scheming uncle is
punished for the crimes he has committed. Alfred, Anita, and Alfred’s mother
live in Anita’s house having the guirestcai
or riches, which now rightfully belonged to Anita.
To go back to an earlier point, in the
world that Fernandes opens to his readers, suffering and poverty borne with
humility and equanimity does not lead to more suffering and poverty, but to a
genuinely happy life – full of love and riches! After all what good are riches
without love and affection? So, if we are to understand the concept of dignidad and how this dignidad was reflected in novels such as
those of Fernandes, then we would need to understand that, within this world,
riches cannot be separated from love, and that social barriers can only be
broken when both are present in copious quantities.
The act of Reading Reginald cannot just
be confined to reading his romanses.
Indeed, we have to decode the very thought and intellectual influences on
novelists like Fernandes. What, for instance, did Fernandes read? Dignidad is perhaps, one of the several
concepts and ways in which to understand this corpus of literature. It is time
we start searching for them.
See also 'Konkani Fiction in your Pocket', here.
(First published in O Heraldo, dt: 11 June, 2014)
As far as I know Reginald bab was reading English Novels. You would always find him with a English novel at the Bastani or Kyani restaurant. Once when when we were having tea at Bastani (this was our regular joint in the evening) with late Orlando Gomes of The Times of India, and M. Boyer, Reginald bab walked in with an English novel in his hands. Seeing that novel in his hands M. Boyer remarked, "Mestri, tuje fuddle romaxichem nanv kitem?"
ReplyDeleteFAUSTO V. da COSTA (on Facebook)
From what I recall reading, Reginald was a good story teller who knew how to plot and structure a novel. His stories were like fairy tales though - and depended on fantasy to achieve his effects or to put it differently, on the willing suspension of disbelief on the part of a reader. His 'romans' did what tiatrs and what Bollywood films do in their respective genres. I suppose that if one wants to privilege him, or portray him as the chronicler of the subconscious of a subaltern group then one could, although I suspect such approaches will be subject to the law of diminishing returns after a while. I personally prefer to look at him as a story teller with a message and study his rhetorical techniques to better understand what he's saying.
ReplyDeleteCemeteries are by no means dead spaces. They are alive with meanings and in some cases, these places of the dead tell us a great deal about the cultures of the living. In some places, cemeteries become contested spaces precisely because they are inconvenient 'embodiments' of a nation's past or history that the dominant elite seek to erase...a form of landscape cleansing.
ReplyDeleteALBERTO GOMES (on Facebook)
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete