During a recent visit to the Central
Library in Panjim, I stumbled upon an entry in the database titled “Theatr
Neketr Fuddarachem” authored by “Reginaldo Fernandes”. Knowing that generally
Reginald Fernandes used an anglicized version of his name in most of his romanses, I decided to make sure if it
was the same Reginald that I was interested in. The book procured for me was a
small, pocket-sized one with no more than 70 pages which had badly yellowed and
had become brittle as well. This book was published from Bombay in 1936.
1936? There hung a question in my mind:
was the author the same Reginald Fernandes who wrote romanses from the 1950s onwards? To be moderately sure about this,
his date of birth needed to be ascertained. Help came in from the editor of Gulab and The Goan Review Fausto V. da Costa who informed me that Reginald
was born on June 14, 1914. This meant that when Reginald had authored and
published this tiatr he was only around
22 years old. This means that if Reginald’s literary history is to be charted
we have to go back to as early as 1936.
Reading this text no doubt raises more
issues and questions about this genre of Konkani literature. This is because,
first and foremost, when views are being expressed that tiatrists do not publish and document their scripts, here was
someone quite young and already printing his works. Was he an exception?
Indeed, Reginald seems to be the exception as even today a lot needs to be done
as far as documenting the scripts of tiatr.
Secondly, why was a young writer publishing his script? What were the
conditions and factors that allowed such a person like Reginald to publish his
work? Is it the only tiatr that he
wrote and/or published? And if so why did he shift to writing romanses later in his life? Suffice it
to say that these are questions for the future, for our purpose in Reading
Reginald is quite different: to see what unfolds in his tiatr.
The story revolves around two young
lovers Boby and Flora. In keeping with many of his writings in later times,
Reginald portrays these two lovers as not equal to each other. In the very
first scene or the opening act set in a garden, Boby tells Flora that she is
from “Venice” and he is from “Russia”. The reference is at once enigmatic as it
is revealing. What it immediately reveals is that because they are not same
socially or economically, the young lovers will face opposition, and indeed
later in the tiatr this is exactly
what happens. The reason why this reference is enigmatic is because it is not
clear from where Reginald is taking his inspiration from. Immediately, what
comes to one’s mind, considering the fact that many Romi writers would adapt
from English and other literatures, is some Shakespearian influence. But as one
reads further, this reference never gains any clarity as far as its provenance
is concerned.
Considering the fact that towards the
climax of the tiatr, the characters
engage in sword fights, the hero of the tiatr
being thrown in jail and his lover entering the prison dressed like a man to
free the hero, it would not be surprising that detailed study would reveal a
mixture or medley of influences that is not just confined to Shakespearian
drama. Thus, the act of Reading Reginald involves not just locating the
provenance of the influences on the writer, but also acknowledging the
influences of European literatures as legitimate in the development and
progress of Konkani literature.
The story is simple: two young lovers, with
the girl hailing from an economically well-off family. There is a third person,
Alvaro, who is jealous of the love of Boby and Flora and tries every scheme in
the book to separate them, and thereby inherit the wealth through marriage to
Flora. If we would like to know more about the influences and thought process of
Reginald and try to link them to his later writings, then I think this tiatr that he wrote can be used as a
starting point considering the fact that he was just 22 years old when he wrote
it.
Another reason why Neketr Fuddarachem is a fascinating text is because not only does
it include the cantaram (songs) that
accompanied the tiatr but also the
musical notations. So Reginald is not just an able writer, a composer, but also
a musician and all these facets of his personality come together in this text. Most
of the dialogues rhyme, perhaps to provide the necessary dramatic or theatric
effects. Such texts wherein prose, dialogues, cantaram, and music come together can also point to us alternate
ways in which to conceptualize the nature and function of Konkani writings in
the Roman script. More so because if one compares how scenes or podd’ddes change in a tiatr,
similarly in Reginald’s romanses he
deliberately makes the reader know that the focus of the story is being shifted
to some other aspect and/or location of the story. So, a Reginald romans, in a sense, also works like a tiatr.
I admit that I have not been able to
give a definite answer to the meaning of the reference to “Venice” and
“Russia”. However, by reflecting on such references in Romi writings one can
come up with new ways to engage with Konkani and Goan culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment